few days ago I posted about what was said by Clarke, the British Minister, about those "tricks" that would involve increasing the effectiveness of the now endless struggle against terrorism in European countries .
He spoke in Parliament, the Minister of the Interior, Pisanu, with a speech to the Chamber welcomed by all sides (as usual the league is no exception ... but I did not even put a comment. If you need to know the objections Lega you place a link ).
In summary the proposals of the Minister:
- no dry introduction of special laws, legal institutions are there, only to be eventually adjusted and adapted to the situation;
- introduction of "investigative interviews", ie interviews (interrogations I call them) possible without the presence of a lawyer;
- bring legal duration of detention to 24 hours to facilitate such transactions for the identification of "suspicious"
- to grant residence permits to those who actively participate and give important contributions to the fight against terrorism;
- possibility of more free access to databases of telephone companies;
- strengthening of the surveillance system of public transport, at any level (port, rail, urban).
say that as always there are proposals more or less valid, and certainly appreciate the introduction, the no special laws.
But all this investigative effort, monitoring, control, needs a critical piece: the police.
Men and women who devote their time, their work, their skills, and even threaten their very lives to be present and alert throughout the Italian territory.
Serve money to support these men and women, providing them with technologically advanced equipment, safety devices for individuals, trained, efficient and useful means of investigation, to give them a decent salary, and rightly proportionate to the risk they run every day (well , a deputy takes perhaps too much money to sit in parliament compared to those who take a policeman to intervene during a robbery ... We need to proportion things ...).
Surfing the internet I discover a thousand and more news regarding the reduction of appropriations to the police: I do not back the bill.
cite a link on all 19 pages in a pdf explains how the 2005 Budget reduces funding for public security and armed forces , the pdf is presented by the Parliamentary Group and La Margherita Olive DL.
Even without considering the merits of the particular views of the political group, there are many tables, concrete data, and many signs "-".
Here are the accounts that I mentioned before, that does not add up:
1) it says that "the guard was never down," even if we now talk of increasing vigilance against terrorism: how come it supervises? Cutting the legs of those who must watch?
2) Because the appropriations continue to decline, while instead they continue to waste money, without going into detail of the billions of ways that our MPs know for wasting taxpayers' money ...
I know, this conversation can sometimes end up in popular belief, the banal, but it seems to speak of things that can not happen in Italy, but ...
Sometimes I'd sit down and see me in front of someone who meets many, many questions ...
0 comments:
Post a Comment