Monday, April 5, 2010

Creative Usb Stereo Mix

Review: Avatar



We will send our message this ... E 'SPARTA!
Ah no, sorry, wrong movie.

Trailer in English

--------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------

Title: Avatar
Year: 2009
Country: USA
Genre: Sci-Fi
Length: 162 minutes
Director: James Cameron
Screenplay: James Cameron
Cast: Sam Worthington (Jake Sully), Zoe Saldana (Neytiri), Stephen Lang (Col. Quaritch), Michelle Rodriguez (Trudy), Sigourney Weaver (Mr. Grace), Giovanni Ribisi (Parker Selfridge)
Production: James Cameron, Jon Landau
Distribution: 20th Century Fox

- -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------

The gestation of this review has been long and painful.
Every time I watch a movie, in fact, explode from the desire to talk and share my views with someone. More often than not the only victim at hand is the irreducible Beppe, and as to my delusions of grandeur only one party is not enough I made up this blog in the vain hope of finding others in the immensity of the network. Unfortunately, the majority of the time I turn on the PC instead of putting them in writing is taken to be discouraged and let myself be distracted by a thousand other crap that the internet allows me to pursue. Here are my ideas so that the tyranny of the brain in a corner waiting for a propitious moment in which to express it properly - and so pass the days, weeks, the months and sometimes years (as has happened with many actions on True Heroes ).

Avatar has made me decide once and for all to become aware of this situation and change my goals so as not to kill Flat10 permanently. I realized, in fact, that if it takes me so long to write a review is because in theory I do not want to limit myself to just say if a movie is good or bad after a brief summary of the plot like so many others do, however. What I would like to do more analysis - but my love of detail would lead me to comment on the film almost scene by scene, what that requires a lot of time and effort to me that I write and to read the visitor.

now on so I'll be much, much more than I did with summary Inglourious Basterds and how I wanted to continue to do. I hope to be able to keep interesting, and if my readers will leave comments and questions to my work, I will be happy to respond. The blog exists primarily for that.

----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------


Na'Vi , Tomcats puffosi with pigtails Jamaican hi-tech

$ 237 million well spent ... but maybe not

Avatar I did not like.
And not just because I could not believe the disproportionate success of the public who found worldwide, but also the praise of critics rated as Roger Ebert, I went to look twice. No way, my opinion has not changed.
I do not deny it is a superb piece of entertainment - but beyond the spectacular shots of beautiful pictures and you go a little further. The story would offer many ideas, but is also peppered with so many Americans to drop their arms. The villains are nasty and tontissimi. They spend billions to traverse the universe and to invest in research, but then the scientists do not care and kill a lot of biological miracles to dig a big hole. Not only that: even though they are armed to the teeth, they use their planes at low altitude to get by happily exterminate the flying lizards, instead of being a bit 'higher or directly to fire a rocket. Instead the good, of course, are very good. Especially Jake, who is the chosen one and learned to use his alien body in spite of all the others want to support us long training sessions to learn how to use it properly.

And after two hours and three quarters of the film, as well as some nice battle scene, I can not remember a dialogue that is worthy of note, a character that has struck me as new or realistic fiction or an idea that was nice as it should be explored. The question of the transmigration of his consciousness from one body to another, in fact, was immediately put on the background to make room for Pocahontas. Raising the barrel on the concepts that turned out to be a winning, since the 20th Century Fox with this film has earned about $ 3 billion (and gain some with the 'home video ). I am a bit 'sad but think that so much money went into special effects and easy emotions rather than on content with more pulp.


Sam Worthington gives us an intense intelligent expression, while facing away from the ELF should be observed in formaldehyde

A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away ... but no.

James Cameron says Avatar is his Star Wars . I disagree. Star Wars had a spectacular design, and even if you were there too the revival of un'archetipo (the one the girl in danger), the characters were much more varied and interesting. The comparison between Darth Vader and then the Colonel Quaritch, or between the lightsabers and the avatars simply does not hold - nor the helicopters and the concept of 'I see you "against the Black Death and the Force.

Beyond the simple message pacifists and ecologists, from Avatar there is little to remember. Rather than Star Wars, I compare it to Avatar Tron . The 82 Disney revolutionized cinema in the way in which they exploit the computer graphics and became an object of worship for the way he treated the world of video games, but after a few years became a film known until a few nerd. And, frankly, well he was, given the history of cartoon idiot who proposes (but who also loved it at the Great Ebert ! 11).

----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------

Pro
+ i +
Na'vi are pretty realistic idea of \u200b\u200bUSB embedded in the tail
+ beautiful scenes of battle not boring

+ + is colored, the bad guys lose and the good guys win the
+ developed technology to achieve Avatar is revolutionary

Against
- good design for a cartoon from Pixar, but not for a live action film
- Na'vi apart from, other animals have a graphic video game
- characters are not interesting
-
stupid dialogues - rather than make them do something, not Na'vi players simply hang around, to face the "world living "
- the ideas are explored and badly
- Pocahontas
space - good guys versus bad American accent simplification
- disproportionate budget for a film with very few commercial content

Judgement
- 3, and are was good to add the last "pro" which is actually an entirely independent of the final quality of the film itself.
Cameron's latest film is a pleasant entertainment and nothing more. I would stay surprised if, in thirty years , someone will quote again Avatar , play with dolls or video games the movies, or go to science fiction convention in disguise from wild blue. I predict however that 3D and SimulCam Cameron have come to stay.

0 comments:

Post a Comment