deleted Autorietà d 'Setting ATO
1-d. Article 2 of Law December 23, 2009, No 191, 186 is inserted after paragraph as follows: "186-bis. As from one year from the date of entry into force of this Act, shall be deleted from the authorities of the territorial scope of Articles 148 and 201 of legislative decree of 3 April 2006, no 152, and subsequent modificazioni.Decorso the same period, any action of the Territorial scope of authority shall be void. By unanno the date of entry into force of this Act, give the regions with the functions already carried dalleAutorità law, respecting the principles of subsidiarity, differentiation and adequacy. Are hereby repealed Articles 148 and 201 of Legislative Decree No 152, 2006.
Wednesday, December 22, 2010
Saturday, December 11, 2010
How Effective Is Bonamine
Points of You
Tuna and Mafia
Official site: Points of You
Poll on POY: Survey
Production House: Framelife Entertainment
prejudices and clichés, who does not know them? The Germans swallow sausages and guzzling beer all the time, the English drink tea every day at five o'clock, and they love to queue, the Italians and the Mafia are more or less the same thing and the French have cramps in strength to carry baguettes under the arm.
Points of You is a new web series produced in Germany focused on the stories of four European students who are found to live in an apartment in Berlin. Bastian, German, is a computer genius affectionate to his plan Flora and with an inclination to romance. Élodie, French, is a provocative environmental activist. Ryan, English, is an actor and self-styled ladies' man, cook as a hobby and king of the party. Sofia, Italian, is a physics student with a special connection with God
Each episode Points of You is presented in multiple versions corresponding to different "views" of the four main characters, made unique thanks to different visual and narrative styles. For example, Bastian is a person nervous and insecure, and its whisker version of the facts makes the camera fast and jerky movements, while Sofia, cold and calculating, he lives in a black and white inhabited by a few objects important color.
Wednesday, November 8 was published online in the pilot episode and the Mafia Tuna, defined as the second episode of the series' first season. The production of POY is very expensive and the manufacturer Framelife Entertainment wants to lead a ' survey to test the show and know what pleases the public before producing the rest of the episodes. The intention is to create a series as much as possible international audience attracting at least every European country represented by four players - not objective pursued with jokes based on puns and local use of subtitles which are a guide to where overlap of the four languages.
Points of You is a very ambitious project worthy of attention. The four actors are all very good and unique style dedicated to each of the protagonists make this new original series and also nice from a technical and artistic as well as his humor. Below you can find three versions of the pilot (including Bastian, Ryan and Sofia, respectively). If you like the show, I invite you to participate in this poll . There you can listen to your support to these children and give them your opinion about what you think are the strengths and weaknesses of this series. The official website is also possible to send a feedback for each version of the episode (you must click on the smiley characters to access different versions). I invite you to log on and to hear your opinion even if the episode did you disgust me! Constructive comments are always good.
Each episode Points of You is presented in multiple versions corresponding to different "views" of the four main characters, made unique thanks to different visual and narrative styles. For example, Bastian is a person nervous and insecure, and its whisker version of the facts makes the camera fast and jerky movements, while Sofia, cold and calculating, he lives in a black and white inhabited by a few objects important color.
Wednesday, November 8 was published online in the pilot episode and the Mafia Tuna, defined as the second episode of the series' first season. The production of POY is very expensive and the manufacturer Framelife Entertainment wants to lead a ' survey to test the show and know what pleases the public before producing the rest of the episodes. The intention is to create a series as much as possible international audience attracting at least every European country represented by four players - not objective pursued with jokes based on puns and local use of subtitles which are a guide to where overlap of the four languages.
Points of You is a very ambitious project worthy of attention. The four actors are all very good and unique style dedicated to each of the protagonists make this new original series and also nice from a technical and artistic as well as his humor. Below you can find three versions of the pilot (including Bastian, Ryan and Sofia, respectively). If you like the show, I invite you to participate in this poll . There you can listen to your support to these children and give them your opinion about what you think are the strengths and weaknesses of this series. The official website is also possible to send a feedback for each version of the episode (you must click on the smiley characters to access different versions). I invite you to log on and to hear your opinion even if the episode did you disgust me! Constructive comments are always good.
Official site: Points of You
Poll on POY: Survey
Production House: Framelife Entertainment
Wednesday, December 1, 2010
One Liner Congratulations Baby
acceptance of waste at landfill
After a wait that has lasted over a year, was finally published in the Official Journal of 1 December 2010, Dm 27 September 2010 on the revision of the eligibility criteria of the landfill waste. The wait
by firms, supervisory authorities and the local communities was high, especially in relation to the issue of eligibility discharge of "sludge" of different origin, a mainly organic matrix.
decree of 27 September 2010, in addition to correcting the obvious errors and inaccuracies contained in the previous Dm August 3, 2005, makes the national rule on the eligibility of the waste dump more responsive to the guidelines (Decision 2003/33/EC) and especially tend to solve the problem related to the landfill to dispose of sewage sludge in organic matrix that under the previous legislation, could not be admitted because of the high value of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is usually performed.
After a wait that has lasted over a year, was finally published in the Official Journal of 1 December 2010, Dm 27 September 2010 on the revision of the eligibility criteria of the landfill waste. The wait
by firms, supervisory authorities and the local communities was high, especially in relation to the issue of eligibility discharge of "sludge" of different origin, a mainly organic matrix.
decree of 27 September 2010, in addition to correcting the obvious errors and inaccuracies contained in the previous Dm August 3, 2005, makes the national rule on the eligibility of the waste dump more responsive to the guidelines (Decision 2003/33/EC) and especially tend to solve the problem related to the landfill to dispose of sewage sludge in organic matrix that under the previous legislation, could not be admitted because of the high value of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) is usually performed.
Sunday, July 25, 2010
Cruising Spots In Goa
Review: Inception
Title: Inception
Year: 2010
Country: Canada, France, Japan, Morocco, UK, USA
Genre: Thriller, Sci-Fi
Length: 148 minutes
Director: Christopher Nolan
Screenplay: Christopher
Nolan Cast: Leonardo DiCaprio (Cobb), Joseph Gordon-Levitt (Arthur), Ellen Page (Ariadne), Tom Hardy (Eames), Ken Watanabe (Saito), Cillian Murphy (Robert Fischer Jr.), Marion Cotillard (Mal)
Production: Warner Bros. Pictures, Legendary Pictures, Syncopy
Distribution: Warner Bros. Pictures
------------------------------ -------------------------------------------------- -----
Title: Inception
Year: 2010
Country: Canada, France, Japan, Morocco, UK, USA
Genre: Thriller, Sci-Fi
Length: 148 minutes
Director: Christopher Nolan
Screenplay: Christopher
Nolan Cast: Leonardo DiCaprio (Cobb), Joseph Gordon-Levitt (Arthur), Ellen Page (Ariadne), Tom Hardy (Eames), Ken Watanabe (Saito), Cillian Murphy (Robert Fischer Jr.), Marion Cotillard (Mal)
Production: Warner Bros. Pictures, Legendary Pictures, Syncopy
Distribution: Warner Bros. Pictures
WARNING: This review contains spoilers .
Cobb is a thief of ideas. He is able to get along with his colleagues in the dreams of people like him who are connected to a special machine, and thus inverstiga firsthand their minds to obtain information otherwise inaccessible. It 's a tough job and risky, especially if the person you are trying to penetrate the mind has been trained to defend against this attack mental - or if the thief suffer from the same that led him to materialize ghosts of his past to 'inside the dream that distract him from his work. Even more difficult is to enter ideas rather than remove them, because you have to convince the person involved that the idea comes from themselves and not by outsiders. Cobb was taken over by wealthy Japanese tycoon Saito enters the mind of the child because of its largest competitor, the young Robert Fischer, and convinced of his own accord to dismantle the multinational empire built by his father.
The mental health of an extractor as Cobb depends totem, an object can tell when you are actually in reality rather than a dream.
director Christopher Nolan is a particular. In fact, his career has always made films very interesting from the point of view and narrative that have always marked for the attention given to the exploration of the psychology of characters. However, in my opinion, has never particularly distinguished for his shots. At least, when I think of his films (I've seen all except the first, Following ) I will always think of stories and characters, but never really picture worthy of note. Since Inception trailer just seemed that this time the director would finally accompanied the "psychological story" even in large sequences.
A road that turns back on itself - one of the most spectacular images of the film ... and even more unnecessary for narrative
The problem is that Inception is a film about the dreams he has little dream. Cobb spends the first hour of the film to explain how his work, what happens and what you risk when you infiltrate the dream of a person, how do we obtain information through this technique, and those who need to realize this mission of "graft." During this first part, expenses, among other things also to train the young to do Ariadne "architect's dream," we will see buildings that bend, fruit exploding mirrors that open roads and loops that represent the dreamer's subconscious ready to attack as they infiltrated the antibodies of the mind. When the mission begins true then one would expect to see phenomenal things, given that it was spending an hour just to prepare the ground ... but no. The mission consists in accomplishing three dreams within each other, because (for some reason not very clear to me) this would have to convince the victim that the idea is genuinely his. But the dreams of Robert Fischer are not so or so . Even so or so . I'm pretty ... so.
People that floats! Uuuh, cool!
Without it except for the second dream, featuring Joseph Gordon-Levitt (in my opinion the only character with a truly three-dimensional and sympathetic) engaged in a floating hotel where there is no longer the force of gravity because of what's happening in the first dream, the other two dreams consist of a chase aboard a van and in a firefight that place in a fortress perched on a snowy mountain. The ironic thing is that the second dream begins to become really interesting when the dreamer if they have already gone in the third dream - that is when that other dream for him has ceased to exist! And there is very low touch points: Arthur in fact not only fights with people who actually do not really exist and which therefore do not give a damn, but when he puts out a game with a trick that takes advantage the paradox of the Escher staircase already shown in the training phase of Ariadne, exclaims: "Paradox". In short, the classic Hollywood legend disguised strophic one-liners that would otherwise take the audience too stupid to catch it yourself. In the world of
Inception dreams are not dreams at all, but something closer to reality - virtual worlds where anything can happen but with rules firmly and very rational, and not projecting anything of memories, fears and the thoughts of the dreamer, as it should be. The only presence is in the subconscious of anonymous passers / waiters / soldiers who live their dreams and attacking Cobb and Co. but in addition to playing the classic role of "bad-with-a-mira-of-shit" do little else.
Look segs
In Inception as there are criminals who do industrial espionage in the traditional way does not go out of fashion, celery and kidnap their victims to enter their dreams and recover there the information he needs. Then there are useless people who are recruited by the protagonist, in theory, everyone should have their special skills, but essentially do nothing but run and shoot at enemies that do not give a damn. All the most interesting things happen during the phase tutorial , but not during the actual story. Then there are dreams that seem to belong to a person with no imagination and a head full of firecrackers worse than Michael Bay. There is a girl who would think that will have a special role because, uh, is a girl, and there is a Japanese tycoon who for some odd reason he decides to get into first person in the dream of its competitor. There's a criminal gang composed of people better and more attractive since the days of Lupin III. There's also a pounding soundtrack by Hans Zimmer is always the same firing shots solemn horn even when there's nothing solemn. There is a mission of "engagement" boring (who cares to convince one to sign some papers to dismantle the company of his father?) which ends with the victim because he dreamed that his father loved him, then decides that his father loved him and that really has to dismantle its company ( eh?). To complete the picture there is a story of lost ammore interesting, but it drags on for so long and that at some point you hope that Orpheus remains there with his Eurydice in hell just to end it all.
The glass is half right or half wrong?
Inception is one of those movies that make me feel stupid. I admit it. The film was released a few days and seems to be already half cult. On Do the average is 9.3 and is third in the ranking of the 250 best films of all time. Internet is full of blogs that try to interpret the film and its ending, when it does not seem to me there is nothing on which to speculate too much. According to the Empire film is a masterpiece, and so many others. Why? I can not explain it. Everything is beautiful in this film is already in the trailer, the rest are just explanations and barrel. Maybe because people like to ultimately attract the fireworks, and the senseless dressing of words makes them feel intellectuals.
Apparently, however, are not quite fully only - there are other people to have serious doubts about the quality of this film. David Denby agree with me that seem to chase copied and pasted from other action movies that have nothing to do with this story, and that the villains are anonymous and insignificant, and wonders why Cobb's mission should involve the viewer emotionally. Robert Humanick even goes so far as to say that the spiegoni data from various characters are so many and such that appear to be non-playable characters taken from a video game action type Halo with the claims of sophistication. Michelle Alexandria ago like so many others a comparison (negative) Shutter Island, where Leonardo DiCaprio also had visions of a dead wife in a film that claimed to be intelligent without being accompanied by a soundtrack that does everything to try to build an air of importance. Like me, he also has problems with the characters, which should have specific roles but in the end simply do the same thing - to be around.
----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
Pro
+ The starting point + Some
is original as are the faces of children, ideas such as viruses and totem
+ Arthur, the character of Joseph Gordon-Levitt
+ The sequence that Arthur sees floating in a hotel
+ The final
Against
- many unnecessary characters
- anonymous
Dreams - Soundtrack misused
- All the most interesting things happen during training
- Mission main non-emotionally involves
- A lot of corny spiegoni
- Plenty of fireworks at all
- Luuuuuungo!
Judgement
-3
From this movie I expected much, much, soooooo more. Instead I found an action movie of two hours packed with spiegoni, action scenes and anonymous sentimentality which claims to be the dream without being one. Everything that is beautiful in this film is already apparent in the trailer, which also has the advantage to finish in two minutes. As Michelle says Alexandria, Inception is a game full of noise signifying nothing.
Cobb is a thief of ideas. He is able to get along with his colleagues in the dreams of people like him who are connected to a special machine, and thus inverstiga firsthand their minds to obtain information otherwise inaccessible. It 's a tough job and risky, especially if the person you are trying to penetrate the mind has been trained to defend against this attack mental - or if the thief suffer from the same that led him to materialize ghosts of his past to 'inside the dream that distract him from his work. Even more difficult is to enter ideas rather than remove them, because you have to convince the person involved that the idea comes from themselves and not by outsiders. Cobb was taken over by wealthy Japanese tycoon Saito enters the mind of the child because of its largest competitor, the young Robert Fischer, and convinced of his own accord to dismantle the multinational empire built by his father.
The mental health of an extractor as Cobb depends totem, an object can tell when you are actually in reality rather than a dream.
director Christopher Nolan is a particular. In fact, his career has always made films very interesting from the point of view and narrative that have always marked for the attention given to the exploration of the psychology of characters. However, in my opinion, has never particularly distinguished for his shots. At least, when I think of his films (I've seen all except the first, Following ) I will always think of stories and characters, but never really picture worthy of note. Since Inception trailer just seemed that this time the director would finally accompanied the "psychological story" even in large sequences.
A road that turns back on itself - one of the most spectacular images of the film ... and even more unnecessary for narrative
The problem is that Inception is a film about the dreams he has little dream. Cobb spends the first hour of the film to explain how his work, what happens and what you risk when you infiltrate the dream of a person, how do we obtain information through this technique, and those who need to realize this mission of "graft." During this first part, expenses, among other things also to train the young to do Ariadne "architect's dream," we will see buildings that bend, fruit exploding mirrors that open roads and loops that represent the dreamer's subconscious ready to attack as they infiltrated the antibodies of the mind. When the mission begins true then one would expect to see phenomenal things, given that it was spending an hour just to prepare the ground ... but no. The mission consists in accomplishing three dreams within each other, because (for some reason not very clear to me) this would have to convince the victim that the idea is genuinely his. But the dreams of Robert Fischer are not so or so . Even so or so . I'm pretty ... so.
People that floats! Uuuh, cool!
Without it except for the second dream, featuring Joseph Gordon-Levitt (in my opinion the only character with a truly three-dimensional and sympathetic) engaged in a floating hotel where there is no longer the force of gravity because of what's happening in the first dream, the other two dreams consist of a chase aboard a van and in a firefight that place in a fortress perched on a snowy mountain. The ironic thing is that the second dream begins to become really interesting when the dreamer if they have already gone in the third dream - that is when that other dream for him has ceased to exist! And there is very low touch points: Arthur in fact not only fights with people who actually do not really exist and which therefore do not give a damn, but when he puts out a game with a trick that takes advantage the paradox of the Escher staircase already shown in the training phase of Ariadne, exclaims: "Paradox". In short, the classic Hollywood legend disguised strophic one-liners that would otherwise take the audience too stupid to catch it yourself. In the world of
Inception dreams are not dreams at all, but something closer to reality - virtual worlds where anything can happen but with rules firmly and very rational, and not projecting anything of memories, fears and the thoughts of the dreamer, as it should be. The only presence is in the subconscious of anonymous passers / waiters / soldiers who live their dreams and attacking Cobb and Co. but in addition to playing the classic role of "bad-with-a-mira-of-shit" do little else.
Look segs
In Inception as there are criminals who do industrial espionage in the traditional way does not go out of fashion, celery and kidnap their victims to enter their dreams and recover there the information he needs. Then there are useless people who are recruited by the protagonist, in theory, everyone should have their special skills, but essentially do nothing but run and shoot at enemies that do not give a damn. All the most interesting things happen during the phase tutorial , but not during the actual story. Then there are dreams that seem to belong to a person with no imagination and a head full of firecrackers worse than Michael Bay. There is a girl who would think that will have a special role because, uh, is a girl, and there is a Japanese tycoon who for some odd reason he decides to get into first person in the dream of its competitor. There's a criminal gang composed of people better and more attractive since the days of Lupin III. There's also a pounding soundtrack by Hans Zimmer is always the same firing shots solemn horn even when there's nothing solemn. There is a mission of "engagement" boring (who cares to convince one to sign some papers to dismantle the company of his father?) which ends with the victim because he dreamed that his father loved him, then decides that his father loved him and that really has to dismantle its company ( eh?). To complete the picture there is a story of lost ammore interesting, but it drags on for so long and that at some point you hope that Orpheus remains there with his Eurydice in hell just to end it all.
The glass is half right or half wrong?
Inception is one of those movies that make me feel stupid. I admit it. The film was released a few days and seems to be already half cult. On Do the average is 9.3 and is third in the ranking of the 250 best films of all time. Internet is full of blogs that try to interpret the film and its ending, when it does not seem to me there is nothing on which to speculate too much. According to the Empire film is a masterpiece, and so many others. Why? I can not explain it. Everything is beautiful in this film is already in the trailer, the rest are just explanations and barrel. Maybe because people like to ultimately attract the fireworks, and the senseless dressing of words makes them feel intellectuals.
Apparently, however, are not quite fully only - there are other people to have serious doubts about the quality of this film. David Denby agree with me that seem to chase copied and pasted from other action movies that have nothing to do with this story, and that the villains are anonymous and insignificant, and wonders why Cobb's mission should involve the viewer emotionally. Robert Humanick even goes so far as to say that the spiegoni data from various characters are so many and such that appear to be non-playable characters taken from a video game action type Halo with the claims of sophistication. Michelle Alexandria ago like so many others a comparison (negative) Shutter Island, where Leonardo DiCaprio also had visions of a dead wife in a film that claimed to be intelligent without being accompanied by a soundtrack that does everything to try to build an air of importance. Like me, he also has problems with the characters, which should have specific roles but in the end simply do the same thing - to be around.
Pro
+ The starting point + Some
is original as are the faces of children, ideas such as viruses and totem
+ Arthur, the character of Joseph Gordon-Levitt
+ The sequence that Arthur sees floating in a hotel
+ The final
Against
- many unnecessary characters
- anonymous
Dreams - Soundtrack misused
- All the most interesting things happen during training
- Mission main non-emotionally involves
- A lot of corny spiegoni
- Plenty of fireworks at all
- Luuuuuungo!
Judgement
-3
From this movie I expected much, much, soooooo more. Instead I found an action movie of two hours packed with spiegoni, action scenes and anonymous sentimentality which claims to be the dream without being one. Everything that is beautiful in this film is already apparent in the trailer, which also has the advantage to finish in two minutes. As Michelle says Alexandria, Inception is a game full of noise signifying nothing.
Wednesday, July 21, 2010
Can A Felon Bow Hunt In Colorado?
Review: Hubble IMAX 3D
Title: Hubble IMAX 3D
Year: 2010
Country: Canada , Space, USA
Genre: Documentary
Duration: 45 minutes
Director : Toni Myers
Writer: Toni Myers
Performers: Leonaro DiCaprio (narrator), Scott D. Altman, Andrew J. Feustel, Michael T. Good, Gregory C. Johnson, K. Megan McArthur
Production: IMAX Space Ltd., Warner Bros.
Distribution: IMAX, Warner Bros.
---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------
Year: 2010
Country: Canada , Space, USA
Genre: Documentary
Duration: 45 minutes
Director : Toni Myers
Writer: Toni Myers
Performers: Leonaro DiCaprio (narrator), Scott D. Altman, Andrew J. Feustel, Michael T. Good, Gregory C. Johnson, K. Megan McArthur
Production: IMAX Space Ltd., Warner Bros.
Distribution: IMAX, Warner Bros.
I learned of Hubble IMAX 3D thanks to the trailer that was shown before and Avatar of Alice in Wonderland , and only one had made me glad I paid money to see those other two ciofeche of blockbusters. Unlike those other films in 3D, in fact, The Hubble IMAX 3D trailer really gave me the impression of being inside the film. The astronauts connected cables that hold their instruments seemed to touch the face and even the scene where they all gathered in one room to tie his shoes himself was shot from an angle that made me feel like you were 'with them. After months of waiting, I finally managed to go see the Science Museum in London, which has within it, as well as an incredible collection of disparate machines, unbelievably, a multiplex IMAX.
The film is a documentary of three-quarters of an hour that tells the story of Hubble, and shows the shots taken with a camera IMAX 3D during a mission held last year to repair and replace components of the telescope. In addition to this, is made to see a sequence of computer graphics created by combining all the pictures taken by Hubble in its twenty years of service. This three-dimensional reconstruction takes the viewer to explore the interior of a nebula, where solar systems are born wrapped in a cocoon of dust.
The film is not perfect, so Leonardo DiCaprio's narration is a bit 'saccharine and the documentary could have been richer in some places, but since shooting with IMAX camera in space is not exactly simple and the images captured are of extraordinary beauty, it is really of something special. The film is not long and not boring, and finally I use the 3D and engaging in a meaningful way. When I have money, buy a 3D TV only to review the Blu-Ray Hubble IMAX 3D whenever I want.
----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
Pro
+ + Beautiful shots
Use 3D finally effective and meaningful
+ beautiful reconstruction in computer graphics of the interior of a nebula
+ Long enough
Against
- Narration a bit 'tedious and banal
- Maybe you could improve in terms of narrative
Judgement
+2 Look, if you can. Too bad that is not distributed in Italy.
The film is a documentary of three-quarters of an hour that tells the story of Hubble, and shows the shots taken with a camera IMAX 3D during a mission held last year to repair and replace components of the telescope. In addition to this, is made to see a sequence of computer graphics created by combining all the pictures taken by Hubble in its twenty years of service. This three-dimensional reconstruction takes the viewer to explore the interior of a nebula, where solar systems are born wrapped in a cocoon of dust.
The film is not perfect, so Leonardo DiCaprio's narration is a bit 'saccharine and the documentary could have been richer in some places, but since shooting with IMAX camera in space is not exactly simple and the images captured are of extraordinary beauty, it is really of something special. The film is not long and not boring, and finally I use the 3D and engaging in a meaningful way. When I have money, buy a 3D TV only to review the Blu-Ray Hubble IMAX 3D whenever I want.
Pro
+ + Beautiful shots
Use 3D finally effective and meaningful
+ beautiful reconstruction in computer graphics of the interior of a nebula
+ Long enough
Against
- Narration a bit 'tedious and banal
- Maybe you could improve in terms of narrative
Judgement
+2 Look, if you can. Too bad that is not distributed in Italy.
Tuesday, July 13, 2010
Really Good Furniture Stores
Review: What
Title: that Argentina / foo fighters
Year: 2009
Country: France, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Spain, USA
Genre: Biography , Historical
Length: 135 minutes + 134
Director: Steven Soderbergh
Screenplay: Peter Buchman and Benjamin A. van der Veen
Cast: Benicio Del Toro (Ernesto "Che" Guevara), Demian Bichir (Fidel Castro)
Production: Laura Bickford Productions
Distribution: IFC Films, Optimum Releasing
----------------------------- -------------------------------------------------- ------
Title: that Argentina / foo fighters
Year: 2009
Country: France, Mexico, Puerto Rico, Spain, USA
Genre: Biography , Historical
Length: 135 minutes + 134
Director: Steven Soderbergh
Screenplay: Peter Buchman and Benjamin A. van der Veen
Cast: Benicio Del Toro (Ernesto "Che" Guevara), Demian Bichir (Fidel Castro)
Production: Laura Bickford Productions
Distribution: IFC Films, Optimum Releasing
Since I have a new computer, I'm always looking for new Blu-Ray to enrich my collection of original discs. Today, spend even a penny for a movie or a video game has become practically useless if not "stupid", but downloading a movie in high definition is still a torture, and sometimes I like to reward you with a nice movie HD also promises to be more of yet another stupid Hollywood. So I chose to buy What Part One and Part Two What by Steven Soderbergh. The figure of Ernesto Guevara in fact has always fascinated me, but I have never heard enough about him documented, and since I know that Benicio Del Toro is a good actor and that the film had also been well received at Cannes, I decided to throw up this long biopic divided into two parts.
The first film tells the events surrounding the Cuban Revolution of '56-'58, and is interrupted by the flash-forward black and white on the visit to the headquarters of Che Guevara United Nations in New York in '64. Soderbergh does not care any way to introduce the character, but immediately starts in the middle of the action: on the one hand being interviewed by an American journalist, the other meets Fidel Castro at a dinner with some friends to discuss the Revolution. The film continues with a documentary style that shows the lives of revolutionaries who devote themselves to the spot, they train, they get sick, desert, ambushing troops finally liberate Cuba from Batista and Del
What is actually said very little. Although it is indisputably the star of this story, the director is expected that those who watch this film is already documented on his character and history of the main building we have seen events that involved. His motivations are not explained, his relationship with Fidel and other revolutionaries is barely investigated, but instead is placed in a care praticolarissima reconstruct the battles and life in the forest in Cuba, with such detail and attention that seems to be looking at the original material.
The film ends after the capture of the city of Santa Clara with Che Guevara who travels by car with a column of revolutionaries into Havana.
What is actually said very little. Although it is indisputably the star of this story, the director is expected that those who watch this film is already documented on his character and history of the main building we have seen events that involved. His motivations are not explained, his relationship with Fidel and other revolutionaries is barely investigated, but instead is placed in a care praticolarissima reconstruct the battles and life in the forest in Cuba, with such detail and attention that seems to be looking at the original material.
The film ends after the capture of the city of Santa Clara with Che Guevara who travels by car with a column of revolutionaries into Havana.
The second film begins in '66, when Che Guevara's attempt to foment a revolution Boliviana, a company which turns out to be a failure. The film is shot with a rhythm much slower than the first, and even the colors of the Andes are much darker and more greyish than the Caribbean - all help to emphasize the difference with the passion and the success of the Cuban. What the years that passed between the taking of Santa Clara and the beginning of this adventure is not suicidal told absolutely nothing - nothing of his years as minister, nothing of his time as an ambassador around the world, and none of its revolutionary period in the Congo.
Both films will last just over two hours, but the first as he weighs the second lasted four and six. In his review, James Rocchi writes:
' Che does not show the man behind the t-shirt, but in a much more interesting choosing to show us how the man ended up on the t-shirt. Che makes little of Guevara's personal life (that's what I felt, this is what he loved, this is what he believes and that is what made him what it was) but simply shows us some ( not all) of the events of his life that changed him and the story. '
Yes and no. The fact that the film does not speak of the life of Che Guevara, although it should be a biopic, we agree. The fact that shows "how it got on t-shirt "is rather questionable. The film in fact shows Che Guevara do this and that but never did see anyone worship him as an icon. This upstream knows the viewer.
'Ugly biographical films try to tell you everything about a person's life and a good biographical films invite you to discover things that are not shown on the screen. That is, without doubt, a good biographical drama '.
Why? If a film is biographical, should not be talking, say, of his life, for example? I mean, if I should take a book on the life of Martin Luther King and I tell the minute his speech "I Have a Dream" but not tell me how he came to be the person I would find that it was incomplete. And if a reviewer told me about it well, saying "it makes me want to watch a documentary," I get angry. Why does a film have to be less than a book and entice them to read? If I chose the film I wanted the movie, dammit!
'There is no narration, only a few titles to establish time and place, it is assumed that the public is an adult and able to follow the film, and as a few films do this courtesy is a nice choice and welcome. '
axes? But I have found it disgusting and incomprehensible.
The second film, "Guerrilla" , has a few words that speak of the six years of interventionist Guevara (who, it must be said, they saw him make some of the most extreme and violent acts in the name of the construction of a new Cuba). '
If the figure of Che Guevara is much praised and despised on the left to right, would not be interesting - and a little neutral - also show this time, and have a more three-dimensional portrait of the character? When I wrote on Facebook that I wanted a good movie about Che Guevara, "my friend Teresa said that" it would be like having a good movie about Hitler. " Embhé? Even a movie about a mass murderer of Jews can be "good" that is well done, if we look at the character in the most complete, accurate, documented, and honest as possible. But What this does not happen, because the character is not taken into consideration at all. Yeah that Soderbergh and Del Toro have spent years to gather information about Che Guevara, also going to meet those people still alive who knew him personally. What do you do with a lot of research if we always show it in the middle of the jungle, scratching his beard? Why this choice should be made directing the film "artistic" and "original", while a traditional approach would be despicable?
'I can only shudder to meet the requirement more enlightening monologues by the actors, or more time devoted to the loves of the rebel leader, or any dilution or alteration made to reach a wider audience and profitable. 'But I
I would feel comfortable and warm. Because the cinema is necessarily staid serious? Che Guevara I do not ask us to sing it, firing volleys of gunfire, or worse than Tony Montana rattles off one-liners tough as Schwarzenegger, but what is shown his character! Through dialogue! What's wrong? And because a dialogue has to be a dilution or alteration? There are bundles and bundles of documents about Che Guevara, many written by himself. It would be so difficult to rebuild the box that shows in more detail what kind of person was he?
' Che does not tell us everything about Guevara, does not feel the need to conform to the vision of him as a martyr of the left or the right of him as a murderess. It 's simple, direct and wants the audience to face its own idea: "Here is a man, this is what he did, so he lived, that is how he died." Che is a film that communicates excitement, pathos and sheer passion for cinema is a piece of art worthy of being examined and discussed, that opens opportunities and encourages them to think and feel emotions without telling you what you should think and feel. '
Here Rocchi right: That does not tell us anything. Too bad that, for some strange perverse reason, he sees it as an honor. Maybe it makes him a snob. Probably he is a professor of Cuban history that has been excited to see rebuilt some guerrilla actions of his favorite hero, but for an outsider the movie is incomprehensible. And that means not "treat the public as intelligent people," but "talk and badly" and that's it.
'Intelligent, beautiful, raw and brilliant, Che is not only the story of a revolutionary is a revolution in itself.
I HOPE NOT !!!!!
----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
Pro
+ Benicio Del Toro And 'Che Guevara
+ Very well reconstructed the various guerrilla
+ Appearance interesting documentary
Against
- Benicio Del Toro's skill is wasted here
- incomprehensible to those who do not already know all the facts upstream
- Incomplete: not really a biopic, but only one (long) re-interpretation of some events
- The first film is boring
- The second film is a torture
Judgement
-2
But it is so staid that would give even less than ten thousand. Too bad, missed opportunity. Soderbergh is a good director for the shots, but despite its narrative choices are certainly original, however, remain questionable. To make matters worse the movie, then, is the fact that Blu-Ray of Optimum Releasing force to look good half-hour of advertising the one before watching the movie itself. A great insult to the paying customer that makes you want to download movies from the Internet, burn it and distribute it in free ride for revenge.
Both films will last just over two hours, but the first as he weighs the second lasted four and six. In his review, James Rocchi writes:
' Che does not show the man behind the t-shirt, but in a much more interesting choosing to show us how the man ended up on the t-shirt. Che makes little of Guevara's personal life (that's what I felt, this is what he loved, this is what he believes and that is what made him what it was) but simply shows us some ( not all) of the events of his life that changed him and the story. '
Yes and no. The fact that the film does not speak of the life of Che Guevara, although it should be a biopic, we agree. The fact that shows "how it got on t-shirt "is rather questionable. The film in fact shows Che Guevara do this and that but never did see anyone worship him as an icon. This upstream knows the viewer.
'Ugly biographical films try to tell you everything about a person's life and a good biographical films invite you to discover things that are not shown on the screen. That is, without doubt, a good biographical drama '.
Why? If a film is biographical, should not be talking, say, of his life, for example? I mean, if I should take a book on the life of Martin Luther King and I tell the minute his speech "I Have a Dream" but not tell me how he came to be the person I would find that it was incomplete. And if a reviewer told me about it well, saying "it makes me want to watch a documentary," I get angry. Why does a film have to be less than a book and entice them to read? If I chose the film I wanted the movie, dammit!
'There is no narration, only a few titles to establish time and place, it is assumed that the public is an adult and able to follow the film, and as a few films do this courtesy is a nice choice and welcome. '
axes? But I have found it disgusting and incomprehensible.
The second film, "Guerrilla" , has a few words that speak of the six years of interventionist Guevara (who, it must be said, they saw him make some of the most extreme and violent acts in the name of the construction of a new Cuba). '
If the figure of Che Guevara is much praised and despised on the left to right, would not be interesting - and a little neutral - also show this time, and have a more three-dimensional portrait of the character? When I wrote on Facebook that I wanted a good movie about Che Guevara, "my friend Teresa said that" it would be like having a good movie about Hitler. " Embhé? Even a movie about a mass murderer of Jews can be "good" that is well done, if we look at the character in the most complete, accurate, documented, and honest as possible. But What this does not happen, because the character is not taken into consideration at all. Yeah that Soderbergh and Del Toro have spent years to gather information about Che Guevara, also going to meet those people still alive who knew him personally. What do you do with a lot of research if we always show it in the middle of the jungle, scratching his beard? Why this choice should be made directing the film "artistic" and "original", while a traditional approach would be despicable?
'I can only shudder to meet the requirement more enlightening monologues by the actors, or more time devoted to the loves of the rebel leader, or any dilution or alteration made to reach a wider audience and profitable. 'But I
I would feel comfortable and warm. Because the cinema is necessarily staid serious? Che Guevara I do not ask us to sing it, firing volleys of gunfire, or worse than Tony Montana rattles off one-liners tough as Schwarzenegger, but what is shown his character! Through dialogue! What's wrong? And because a dialogue has to be a dilution or alteration? There are bundles and bundles of documents about Che Guevara, many written by himself. It would be so difficult to rebuild the box that shows in more detail what kind of person was he?
' Che does not tell us everything about Guevara, does not feel the need to conform to the vision of him as a martyr of the left or the right of him as a murderess. It 's simple, direct and wants the audience to face its own idea: "Here is a man, this is what he did, so he lived, that is how he died." Che is a film that communicates excitement, pathos and sheer passion for cinema is a piece of art worthy of being examined and discussed, that opens opportunities and encourages them to think and feel emotions without telling you what you should think and feel. '
Here Rocchi right: That does not tell us anything. Too bad that, for some strange perverse reason, he sees it as an honor. Maybe it makes him a snob. Probably he is a professor of Cuban history that has been excited to see rebuilt some guerrilla actions of his favorite hero, but for an outsider the movie is incomprehensible. And that means not "treat the public as intelligent people," but "talk and badly" and that's it.
'Intelligent, beautiful, raw and brilliant, Che is not only the story of a revolutionary is a revolution in itself.
I HOPE NOT !!!!!
Pro
+ Benicio Del Toro And 'Che Guevara
+ Very well reconstructed the various guerrilla
+ Appearance interesting documentary
Against
- Benicio Del Toro's skill is wasted here
- incomprehensible to those who do not already know all the facts upstream
- Incomplete: not really a biopic, but only one (long) re-interpretation of some events
- The first film is boring
- The second film is a torture
Judgement
-2
But it is so staid that would give even less than ten thousand. Too bad, missed opportunity. Soderbergh is a good director for the shots, but despite its narrative choices are certainly original, however, remain questionable. To make matters worse the movie, then, is the fact that Blu-Ray of Optimum Releasing force to look good half-hour of advertising the one before watching the movie itself. A great insult to the paying customer that makes you want to download movies from the Internet, burn it and distribute it in free ride for revenge.
Saturday, July 10, 2010
Canadian Sales Tax On Used Boats
Patrick Boivin
Wandering the Internet, I came across the YouTube channel Patrick Boivin, a Canadian director of 35 years specializing in stop-motion animation who has made several short films and music videos. I recommend everyone look at his work, which to me are not only beautiful but also inspiring.
Other shorts
- The Clown
- Radio
- Redite
- La Lettre
- The Promotion
- The Future of Air Travel
Stop-Motion Animation
- AT-AT Day Afternoon ( Making of )
- Condoms are bad?
- Ninja's Unboxing
- Bboy Joker ( Making of )
- Transformers: Jazz with a General Problem ( Making of )
Video Musicali
- Indochine: Le Lac
- Indochine: Playboy
- Iggy Pop: King of the Dogs
Wandering the Internet, I came across the YouTube channel Patrick Boivin, a Canadian director of 35 years specializing in stop-motion animation who has made several short films and music videos. I recommend everyone look at his work, which to me are not only beautiful but also inspiring.
Other shorts
- The Clown
- Radio
- Redite
- La Lettre
- The Promotion
- The Future of Air Travel
Stop-Motion Animation
- AT-AT Day Afternoon ( Making of )
- Condoms are bad?
- Ninja's Unboxing
- Bboy Joker ( Making of )
- Transformers: Jazz with a General Problem ( Making of )
Video Musicali
- Indochine: Le Lac
- Indochine: Playboy
- Iggy Pop: King of the Dogs
Sunday, May 30, 2010
Using Chapstick While Pregnant
Lost: The End Again
The end of Lost - look at your own risk!
In the upcoming DVD will be a culmination of the unprecedented duration of 20 minutes.
The end of Lost - look at your own risk!
In the upcoming DVD will be a culmination of the unprecedented duration of 20 minutes.
After six long years, has finally reached the last episode of Lost . Rethinking the beginning of this series means to rethink 2004, when I was still in the upper house in two years we had satellite TV and had just moved from Tele to Sky +. The comic monthly subscribers this new show was advertised mainly focusing on the presence of Dominic Monhagan, thanks to the success of The Lord of the Rings . I remember looking advertising with suspicion, because as they spoke seemed to be the TV version of Cast Away, and it was not clear if there were elements of the paranormal or not. I watched a few clips from the episode by chance (I think the first episode I saw was "The Moth" ) and I was completely bewildered: I could not understand what relationship there was between the people on the island and those others that led to their normal life around the world.
Locke and Jack opened the Pandora's box to their personal end of Exodus.
Then I looked a bit 'more regularly, until I saw the episode where Jack and Locke opened the hatch and peering inside. I was thunderstruck. She was born an obsession, fueled further by the good old Andrew, who told me what he had read the second season already aired in the U.S.. When in 2006, the U.S. went there in person, I sent it to my guests this dependence, with whom I was fortunate enough to watch live the third, a beautiful season. The fourth season began to be a little 'indigestible, but despite the problems of the Oceanic Six be tedious to me, what happened on the island still excites. Instead I began to feel a genuine sense of disappointment during the fifth season, when after the first exciting episodes seemed Lost was intended to countless episodes filler in which the mysteries continued to accumulate on one another while our heroes are put to work as mechanics and janitors throwing all the opportunity in the wind to investigate directly the DHARMA Initiative.
The Man in Black and Jacob, the demigods of the island, at the beginning of The Incident.
At the end of the fifth season the level of Mindfuck was at stratospheric levels. You begin to see some holes in the plot, but the wonderful finale seemed to promise a great sixth season and forgive the mediocrity of the previous installments. The past glories of this wonderful series and gave hope that, despite sounding far-fetched, all the pieces were going to place in the last 18 episodes. Unfortunately, however, as the sixth season progressed, it became increasingly clear that not only Lost had changed, but the answers that the audience had coveted for so long would never arrive.
Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof, the two main writers
On Lostpedia Forum Italian Dharmilla the user makes a reconstruction of the production of Lost based on "real news and interviews, and never contradicted." Some of these stories were already known to me and sometimes not, and since in his speech is not cited no source, this reconstruction must be taken with a grain of salt. The true history of this production, know only JJ Abrams, Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, and most likely if the door in the tomb. However, if this reconstruction is reliable can be inferred four things. The first is that it is absolutely true that the writers had such a clear idea of \u200b\u200bwhere they wanted to end up at the end of their history as for many years continued to support. The second, which was built Lost chasing the market, keeping the unsolved mysteries as long as possible to keep the audience constantly tense. The third, the writers have lied all the time who said that with Lost wanted to tell "their" history as a real history do not have ever had, but they gradually built, among other things, and also creating several holes in the plot. The fourth, that the people most affectionate to the characters and the story of Lost were spectators and not the writers, when they realized that to have a hen that lays golden eggs for the hands they have exploited to the last. When it came time to put together all the pieces have come to realize that was impossible, they went into a panic and have concluded their work as the amateur writers fanfiction and not by professionals. From aspiring writer which I have to admit that somehow it is comforting to know that you can make millions of dollars throwing together unrelated visions of everything and then come up on stage so easily, but which I was a spectator I can not help but feel betrayed and insulted.
The book taken from the book Things I Noticed of Vozzek69
More or less by the fourth season then I read the blog regularly on the British DarkUFO interventions weekly "theoretical" Vozzek69, who in his book Things I Noticed demonstrated ability indifferent observer, pointing out how they worked the various narrative techniques used to tell Lost, and as there were common elements that made sense that sooner or later These would culminate in a final revelation. Vozzek69 has remained faithful to Lost to the last, and stated that the last episode he liked very much, despite the writers have thrown more than half of the show in the wind. In reading his last two speeches I thought I saw a lover who tries to justify the actions of the woman who betrayed him because they are still confused and in disbelief. I find it ridiculous that a man with so much knowledge and such a great sense of observation will launch along with the rest of the mass in a useless search for the hidden meaning of Lost . If there is a solid story behind, there can be no interpretation!
Whose profile was implied in Jacob's cabin during The Man Behind the Curtain?
The writers have always said that for them the most important thing Lost were the characters and the mysteries. What would also be acceptable, except that the fourth season in then did not deny that this position. One of the best things for me in this series, and I have also strongly contruibuito to make it the success it was, is that during his first three seasons he had always taken all the time that he wanted to tell calmly and in detail the stories and relationships of his characters, which evolve as their past was afloat and clashed with the events of the island. Even when they realized they had committed egregious error introduced Nikki and Paulo have bothered to devote a special episode before you remove them From the fourth season onwards, however, everything began to move at double speed: the characters are been advanced by force (Jack), making their number roughly skimmed die at any moment (Dogen, Ilana; Charles Widmore), and some was also done to change this behavior, all of a sudden, without any real justification, simply because they proved useful for purposes of plot (Sayid). Without counting the absurdity of the question of rules: in the beginning had to be something involving Linus and Widmore, was then passed on to Jacob and the Man in Black, again without explaining their true reason for being. The rules were useful for you to return the characters to behave in that way, but in reality had ceased to respect them even if they might not have happened at all.
Mr. Eko encountered the Monster in The 23rd Psalm
An equally serious error was then at the last moment to introduce the characters of Jacob and the Man in Black when there were only 18 episodes, very little to evolve with complete and correct everything that had been built and left unresolved in the previous one hundred and passes. Though I have found commendable that the Man in Black has been managed so as to make understandable and sometimes even shared his actions, rather than present it as the classic Bad Enemy (several times during the sixth season I found myself siding more to he and Jacob), the His stories have failed to interest me through. First of all, the fact that embodied the body of John Locke was misleading. Though it was nice to have Terry O'Quinn yet despite his character had died, someone else was for me to consider it as a source of confusion. Then, his presence debunked the whole story of the Monster, who for five long years had been presented as the guardian of the island as an entity and impartial and non-human, whereas in the sixth season but became a man so strong too much whining. Even its origins in the cave of light were hasty and unexplained, and its links with the Egyptian mythology almost thrown to the winds.
The heart of the island revealed
Across the Sea "What's there?" Asked the young mother to Jacob when brought before the cave that is the heart of gold 'Island. "Life, death and rebirth," replied the mother. In short, a bit 'what the fuck you want. Jumble of abstract concepts put together just to fill his mouth and give a semblance of mystical answer. And with these three words, Lindelof and Cuse give viewers Lost all the answer to the mysteries of their show: it's fucking you like, people. Shut up buckets, buy our products and put on your heart in peace, so that this is fiction . But because they are good, do it with style, and after sending the last episode of the series very conveniently swear to go to silence the press and never to reveal their interpretation of history and its mysteries (I imagine them escaping me Craxi abroad with money type). They had lived two thousand years ago, probably the Bible would have a few more in the Gospels. Two thousand years ago, however, hardly have done the same money - which will continue to increase with the sale of DVD and official guide.
"Fate Found," read the official poster the sixth and final season of the show. Mha.
I originally intended this action as a simple list of holes in the plot of Lost that have become such simply because in the end there has been no sense of them. Then I realized that not only the list would have been literally endless, but that would not even pregnant. So I decided instead to share with you my views on the series in general and its production. Since studying cinema and live with Beppe in charge of marketing, I am increasingly aware of how what is being proposed to the movies and on television is primarily dictated by the market rather than something that resulted from the mind of someone who really wants to tell a good story well. Lost looked like a white fly, a quality product in the midst of so much stuff that can re-evaluate the kind of show, but like other series before it ( Twin Peaks, The X-Files ; Alias \u200b\u200b; The Sopranos ) is playing so beautifully and so much has been done wrong.
Benjamin Linus active in the Frozen Donkey Wheel There's No Place Like Home.
For me Lost lies unfinished in a limbo of fiction abandoned when Ben turned the wheel ice that is below the Orchid station and moved the Island. I like to think there, in this gray and foggy place, waiting for someone to move up and concludes that he was keeping in mind its original spirit. Probably will never happen, but I wonder if anything in the future if someone decides to redraw this show and groped a reboot. No one will ever be able to match that of figures such as Michael Emerson, but perhaps you will find a compromise, perhaps creating a cartoon that would be nice although not as much cheaper and not be confronted by problems such as the uncontrollable growth of an actor as a young Malcolm David Kelly, or abandonment a key member of the cast as Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje. And if I ever will, I hope that this time is not used again in a pathetic excuse like "it was all a dream" or "in fact we were in Purgatory."
Locke and Jack opened the Pandora's box to their personal end of Exodus.
Then I looked a bit 'more regularly, until I saw the episode where Jack and Locke opened the hatch and peering inside. I was thunderstruck. She was born an obsession, fueled further by the good old Andrew, who told me what he had read the second season already aired in the U.S.. When in 2006, the U.S. went there in person, I sent it to my guests this dependence, with whom I was fortunate enough to watch live the third, a beautiful season. The fourth season began to be a little 'indigestible, but despite the problems of the Oceanic Six be tedious to me, what happened on the island still excites. Instead I began to feel a genuine sense of disappointment during the fifth season, when after the first exciting episodes seemed Lost was intended to countless episodes filler in which the mysteries continued to accumulate on one another while our heroes are put to work as mechanics and janitors throwing all the opportunity in the wind to investigate directly the DHARMA Initiative.
The Man in Black and Jacob, the demigods of the island, at the beginning of The Incident.
At the end of the fifth season the level of Mindfuck was at stratospheric levels. You begin to see some holes in the plot, but the wonderful finale seemed to promise a great sixth season and forgive the mediocrity of the previous installments. The past glories of this wonderful series and gave hope that, despite sounding far-fetched, all the pieces were going to place in the last 18 episodes. Unfortunately, however, as the sixth season progressed, it became increasingly clear that not only Lost had changed, but the answers that the audience had coveted for so long would never arrive.
Carlton Cuse and Damon Lindelof, the two main writers
On Lostpedia Forum Italian Dharmilla the user makes a reconstruction of the production of Lost based on "real news and interviews, and never contradicted." Some of these stories were already known to me and sometimes not, and since in his speech is not cited no source, this reconstruction must be taken with a grain of salt. The true history of this production, know only JJ Abrams, Damon Lindelof and Carlton Cuse, and most likely if the door in the tomb. However, if this reconstruction is reliable can be inferred four things. The first is that it is absolutely true that the writers had such a clear idea of \u200b\u200bwhere they wanted to end up at the end of their history as for many years continued to support. The second, which was built Lost chasing the market, keeping the unsolved mysteries as long as possible to keep the audience constantly tense. The third, the writers have lied all the time who said that with Lost wanted to tell "their" history as a real history do not have ever had, but they gradually built, among other things, and also creating several holes in the plot. The fourth, that the people most affectionate to the characters and the story of Lost were spectators and not the writers, when they realized that to have a hen that lays golden eggs for the hands they have exploited to the last. When it came time to put together all the pieces have come to realize that was impossible, they went into a panic and have concluded their work as the amateur writers fanfiction and not by professionals. From aspiring writer which I have to admit that somehow it is comforting to know that you can make millions of dollars throwing together unrelated visions of everything and then come up on stage so easily, but which I was a spectator I can not help but feel betrayed and insulted.
The book taken from the book Things I Noticed of Vozzek69
More or less by the fourth season then I read the blog regularly on the British DarkUFO interventions weekly "theoretical" Vozzek69, who in his book Things I Noticed demonstrated ability indifferent observer, pointing out how they worked the various narrative techniques used to tell Lost, and as there were common elements that made sense that sooner or later These would culminate in a final revelation. Vozzek69 has remained faithful to Lost to the last, and stated that the last episode he liked very much, despite the writers have thrown more than half of the show in the wind. In reading his last two speeches I thought I saw a lover who tries to justify the actions of the woman who betrayed him because they are still confused and in disbelief. I find it ridiculous that a man with so much knowledge and such a great sense of observation will launch along with the rest of the mass in a useless search for the hidden meaning of Lost . If there is a solid story behind, there can be no interpretation!
Whose profile was implied in Jacob's cabin during The Man Behind the Curtain?
The writers have always said that for them the most important thing Lost were the characters and the mysteries. What would also be acceptable, except that the fourth season in then did not deny that this position. One of the best things for me in this series, and I have also strongly contruibuito to make it the success it was, is that during his first three seasons he had always taken all the time that he wanted to tell calmly and in detail the stories and relationships of his characters, which evolve as their past was afloat and clashed with the events of the island. Even when they realized they had committed egregious error introduced Nikki and Paulo have bothered to devote a special episode before you remove them From the fourth season onwards, however, everything began to move at double speed: the characters are been advanced by force (Jack), making their number roughly skimmed die at any moment (Dogen, Ilana; Charles Widmore), and some was also done to change this behavior, all of a sudden, without any real justification, simply because they proved useful for purposes of plot (Sayid). Without counting the absurdity of the question of rules: in the beginning had to be something involving Linus and Widmore, was then passed on to Jacob and the Man in Black, again without explaining their true reason for being. The rules were useful for you to return the characters to behave in that way, but in reality had ceased to respect them even if they might not have happened at all.
Mr. Eko encountered the Monster in The 23rd Psalm
An equally serious error was then at the last moment to introduce the characters of Jacob and the Man in Black when there were only 18 episodes, very little to evolve with complete and correct everything that had been built and left unresolved in the previous one hundred and passes. Though I have found commendable that the Man in Black has been managed so as to make understandable and sometimes even shared his actions, rather than present it as the classic Bad Enemy (several times during the sixth season I found myself siding more to he and Jacob), the His stories have failed to interest me through. First of all, the fact that embodied the body of John Locke was misleading. Though it was nice to have Terry O'Quinn yet despite his character had died, someone else was for me to consider it as a source of confusion. Then, his presence debunked the whole story of the Monster, who for five long years had been presented as the guardian of the island as an entity and impartial and non-human, whereas in the sixth season but became a man so strong too much whining. Even its origins in the cave of light were hasty and unexplained, and its links with the Egyptian mythology almost thrown to the winds.
The heart of the island revealed
Across the Sea "What's there?" Asked the young mother to Jacob when brought before the cave that is the heart of gold 'Island. "Life, death and rebirth," replied the mother. In short, a bit 'what the fuck you want. Jumble of abstract concepts put together just to fill his mouth and give a semblance of mystical answer. And with these three words, Lindelof and Cuse give viewers Lost all the answer to the mysteries of their show: it's fucking you like, people. Shut up buckets, buy our products and put on your heart in peace, so that this is fiction . But because they are good, do it with style, and after sending the last episode of the series very conveniently swear to go to silence the press and never to reveal their interpretation of history and its mysteries (I imagine them escaping me Craxi abroad with money type). They had lived two thousand years ago, probably the Bible would have a few more in the Gospels. Two thousand years ago, however, hardly have done the same money - which will continue to increase with the sale of DVD and official guide.
"Fate Found," read the official poster the sixth and final season of the show. Mha.
I originally intended this action as a simple list of holes in the plot of Lost that have become such simply because in the end there has been no sense of them. Then I realized that not only the list would have been literally endless, but that would not even pregnant. So I decided instead to share with you my views on the series in general and its production. Since studying cinema and live with Beppe in charge of marketing, I am increasingly aware of how what is being proposed to the movies and on television is primarily dictated by the market rather than something that resulted from the mind of someone who really wants to tell a good story well. Lost looked like a white fly, a quality product in the midst of so much stuff that can re-evaluate the kind of show, but like other series before it ( Twin Peaks, The X-Files ; Alias \u200b\u200b; The Sopranos ) is playing so beautifully and so much has been done wrong.
Benjamin Linus active in the Frozen Donkey Wheel There's No Place Like Home.
For me Lost lies unfinished in a limbo of fiction abandoned when Ben turned the wheel ice that is below the Orchid station and moved the Island. I like to think there, in this gray and foggy place, waiting for someone to move up and concludes that he was keeping in mind its original spirit. Probably will never happen, but I wonder if anything in the future if someone decides to redraw this show and groped a reboot. No one will ever be able to match that of figures such as Michael Emerson, but perhaps you will find a compromise, perhaps creating a cartoon that would be nice although not as much cheaper and not be confronted by problems such as the uncontrollable growth of an actor as a young Malcolm David Kelly, or abandonment a key member of the cast as Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje. And if I ever will, I hope that this time is not used again in a pathetic excuse like "it was all a dream" or "in fact we were in Purgatory."
Sunday, May 9, 2010
Insignia Portable Dvd Player Says No Disc
other interesting things
E 'by a lot of time that I do not update this blog as they should, and I have no excuse for my absence. Especially given the fact that lately I have seen three films (The Joneses , Dogtooth and (500) Days of Summer *), each worthy of a review, for different reasons.
When I am finished with the university will do everything to get to work on these reviews and on others, including Adaptation and the upcoming Robin Hood . But for now I would like to tell you two trailers. The first is to Inception , the new film by Christopher Nolan.
The director of Memento and ** de The Dark Knight is back with a new psychological thriller in which Leonardo DiCaprio plays a thief who gets in people's minds while he was asleep to steal their ideas. As you can see from the trailer and dreamlike sequences crazy out there, and everything seems to promise a great movie. If I ruin this Nolan, will haunt him worse than the songs of Mark Charter on Italian radio.
The second trailer is that instead of Super 8 , new film by JJ Abrams produced with Steven Spielberg. For a while, 'it was rumored that the new draft was supersegretissimo Abrams Cloverfield 2 , but JJ has confirmed that this is an original and not a sequel. The story appears to be set in the '70s and revolves around a group of friends who notice the presence of an alien creature in one of the shots of the film which was filmed in the forest with a Super 8 camera. The similarities Cloverfield are many: although the trailer makes you think otherwise, there are rumors that the film will be shot again with an amateur camera style Blair Witch Project, and the way I like JJ to promote the film to be released summer 2011 was organized viral marketing. Even here, we hope that it comes out a beautiful thing, because Cloverfield the end was very little smoke and roast.
* translated into Italian with the horrible title (500) Days of , and changed the name of the protagonist in an even more horrendous in "sun".
** Ilde this trailer I reported here thinking about you.
When I am finished with the university will do everything to get to work on these reviews and on others, including Adaptation and the upcoming Robin Hood . But for now I would like to tell you two trailers. The first is to Inception , the new film by Christopher Nolan.
The director of Memento and ** de The Dark Knight is back with a new psychological thriller in which Leonardo DiCaprio plays a thief who gets in people's minds while he was asleep to steal their ideas. As you can see from the trailer and dreamlike sequences crazy out there, and everything seems to promise a great movie. If I ruin this Nolan, will haunt him worse than the songs of Mark Charter on Italian radio.
The second trailer is that instead of Super 8 , new film by JJ Abrams produced with Steven Spielberg. For a while, 'it was rumored that the new draft was supersegretissimo Abrams Cloverfield 2 , but JJ has confirmed that this is an original and not a sequel. The story appears to be set in the '70s and revolves around a group of friends who notice the presence of an alien creature in one of the shots of the film which was filmed in the forest with a Super 8 camera. The similarities Cloverfield are many: although the trailer makes you think otherwise, there are rumors that the film will be shot again with an amateur camera style Blair Witch Project, and the way I like JJ to promote the film to be released summer 2011 was organized viral marketing. Even here, we hope that it comes out a beautiful thing, because Cloverfield the end was very little smoke and roast.
* translated into Italian with the horrible title (500) Days of , and changed the name of the protagonist in an even more horrendous in "sun".
** Ilde this trailer I reported here thinking about you.
Wednesday, April 28, 2010
Post Cellulitis Treatment
Red Letter Media
One of my classmate told me recently reported the Plinkett Reviews , more or less in-depth analysis of such films as Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace and Avatar . They are videos on Youtube, some of them quite long (the reviews Episode I and Episode II last one hour and ten and an hour and a half!), But they are really worth the effort. The reviews are filmed as if they were reflections of an elderly homicidal maniac whose mission is to explain to the world why some science fiction movie are colossal crap. The approach of Mr Plinkett reflects what I would do for Flat10 genius and if I had more time available. Council to all those able to understand English to look at!
Thursday, April 15, 2010
Buy Brawny Trash Bags
Review: Shutter Island
HD Trailer English
---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------
Title: Shutter Island
Year: 2010
Country: USA
Genre: Thriller
Length: 138 minutes
Director: Martin Scorsese
Screenplay: Steven Knight and Laeta Kalogridis
Cast: Leonardo DiCaprio (Teddy), Mark Ruffalo (Chuck), Ben Kingsley (Dr. Cawley), Michelle Williams (Dolores), Max von Sydow (Dr. Naerhing), Jackie Earle Haley (George Noyce)
Production: Paramount Pictures, Columbia Pictures
Distribution: Paramount Pictures
--------- -------------------------------------------------- --------------------------
Shutter Island is not really anything special. If you find a movie with a good plot twist or with a schizoid personality, look The Sixth Sense or Fight Club and let lose the last banality of Scorsese.
HD Trailer English
---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -------------
Title: Shutter Island
Year: 2010
Country: USA
Genre: Thriller
Length: 138 minutes
Director: Martin Scorsese
Screenplay: Steven Knight and Laeta Kalogridis
Cast: Leonardo DiCaprio (Teddy), Mark Ruffalo (Chuck), Ben Kingsley (Dr. Cawley), Michelle Williams (Dolores), Max von Sydow (Dr. Naerhing), Jackie Earle Haley (George Noyce)
Production: Paramount Pictures, Columbia Pictures
Distribution: Paramount Pictures
short reviews I promised, so here's the short review. Even
Shutter Island I liked it. Do not yet know very well the work of Martin Scorsese (I admit, to my shame, that so far the only films that I've never seen this and are The Departed, which also left me chilly), but I know anyway His name, and then when I approach her to a movie I expect not mere entertainment, but a work of a certain level. Shutter Island instead belongs to the maximum to the array of films that I find enjoyable on a rainy evening of boredom to pass in front of the television: what I need, exactly, would simply pure entertainment. When I sit down at the cinema, however, want a work. I want something that is trying to shake my imagination, something that I will inspire intense emotions, something that attempts to enrich the culture, even the popular one. From
Shutter Island I did not get anything about this, indeed: with the exception of the sequences set in the concentration camp at Dachau, the only things that caught my attention were four scenes evil. The first is the one that sees the two FBI agents who meet on the boat. DiCaprio tells Ruffalo why they are there and what to do. Later in this film has its initial spiegone why, but it is a flat-spotted the suspicious information that the viewer immediately and call the shot of the final scene. The second is when DiCaprio Ruffalo and climb in the car with the cops and head with them to the mental hospital on the island. The squenza is underscored by a soundtrack exaggerated, so as to render the scene as a parody of itself. The third captain of the guard sees the island's present to the two FBI agents in the wings where the asylum is divided. Even here, again, the film makes fun of himself. The installation is fast, video clips from MTV, and the atmosphere thriller / horror ruined. The fourth, then, is a real icing on the cake. After two hours of investigation to proceed in fits and starts, there is a twist. DiCaprio's just that, like the viewer, can not believe his eyes and his ears. Here then Ben Kingsley pulls out a blackboard and explains the film's ending.
unwatchable.
Pro + All in all, a sense in the end have it
Against
- Full of spiegoni
- Scene badly shot and edited, or otherwise in a very traditional
Judgement
-1 Shutter Island I liked it. Do not yet know very well the work of Martin Scorsese (I admit, to my shame, that so far the only films that I've never seen this and are The Departed, which also left me chilly), but I know anyway His name, and then when I approach her to a movie I expect not mere entertainment, but a work of a certain level. Shutter Island instead belongs to the maximum to the array of films that I find enjoyable on a rainy evening of boredom to pass in front of the television: what I need, exactly, would simply pure entertainment. When I sit down at the cinema, however, want a work. I want something that is trying to shake my imagination, something that I will inspire intense emotions, something that attempts to enrich the culture, even the popular one. From
Shutter Island I did not get anything about this, indeed: with the exception of the sequences set in the concentration camp at Dachau, the only things that caught my attention were four scenes evil. The first is the one that sees the two FBI agents who meet on the boat. DiCaprio tells Ruffalo why they are there and what to do. Later in this film has its initial spiegone why, but it is a flat-spotted the suspicious information that the viewer immediately and call the shot of the final scene. The second is when DiCaprio Ruffalo and climb in the car with the cops and head with them to the mental hospital on the island. The squenza is underscored by a soundtrack exaggerated, so as to render the scene as a parody of itself. The third captain of the guard sees the island's present to the two FBI agents in the wings where the asylum is divided. Even here, again, the film makes fun of himself. The installation is fast, video clips from MTV, and the atmosphere thriller / horror ruined. The fourth, then, is a real icing on the cake. After two hours of investigation to proceed in fits and starts, there is a twist. DiCaprio's just that, like the viewer, can not believe his eyes and his ears. Here then Ben Kingsley pulls out a blackboard and explains the film's ending.
unwatchable.
Pro + All in all, a sense in the end have it
Against
- Full of spiegoni
- Scene badly shot and edited, or otherwise in a very traditional
Judgement
Shutter Island is not really anything special. If you find a movie with a good plot twist or with a schizoid personality, look The Sixth Sense or Fight Club and let lose the last banality of Scorsese.
Wednesday, April 7, 2010
Can You Get A Brazilian Wax While Pregnant
Review: The Matrix
Trinity and Morpheus promise to reveal the truth, because reality is not what it seems ... that are affiliated with Scientology?
---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Title: Matrix (The Matrix)
Year: 1999
Country: USA
Genre: Action / Sci-Fi
Length: 136 minutes
Directed by: Larry and Andy Wachowski
Screenplay: Larry and Andy Wachowski
Performers: Keanu Reeves (Neo), Laurence Fishburne (Morpheus), Carrie-Ann Moss (Trinity), Hugo Weaving (Agent Smith), Joe Pantoliano (Cypher)
Production: Joel Silver
Distribution: Warner Bros. Pictures, Village Roadshow Pictures
---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------------
Trinity and Morpheus promise to reveal the truth, because reality is not what it seems ... that are affiliated with Scientology?
---------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Year: 1999
Country: USA
Genre: Action / Sci-Fi
Length: 136 minutes
Directed by: Larry and Andy Wachowski
Screenplay: Larry and Andy Wachowski
Performers: Keanu Reeves (Neo), Laurence Fishburne (Morpheus), Carrie-Ann Moss (Trinity), Hugo Weaving (Agent Smith), Joe Pantoliano (Cypher)
Production: Joel Silver
Distribution: Warner Bros. Pictures, Village Roadshow Pictures
Some time does my teacher Introduction to Film asked us to do a summary of The Matrix, so I decided to take this opportunity to increase my library of Blu-Ray by going to buy from HMV. When released on DVD in 2000, it looked that film something like three or four times in a row. I was totally in love, as well as all other youngsters who found in the Wachowski brothers' film Star Wars of their generation. Buy the movie rather than download it from the network was therefore a moral duty.
Covering The Matrix through the eyes of now, however, was a different experience: it will be because they are more mature than me or because they are more mature and the time over the years, the sleights of Neo and his associates have become the subject of parody on a more or less daily, but after reviewing the film I could not help but fall in the tunnel of the 'what would have been better looking Ommioddio if they had been less superficial "in which I happen to end up more often.
But Neo, who the fuck is that?
The Matrix is \u200b\u200bone of those few films that have seen all that struck the imagination of everyone, even to those who have not liked. In 1999, almost everyone now had a cell phone and a computer, broadband began to spread and more people were able to understand concepts like "artificial intelligence" and "virtual reality". Matrix has surprised everyone with its spectacular action sequences, and intellettuaolidi that they could not admit that he liked the film to the trivial fistfights have decided to praise him for his modern reinterpretation of the myth of Plato's cave.
But besides some petty piece of philosophy, zen freeze-dried, circus acts and information for beginners there are the inevitable cardboard characters. Who is Thomas Anderson, aka Neo? Where you from? Who are his friends? What are your parents? What makes it so special to turn Trinity into a voyeur and to risk their lives to Morpheus? Bho! All that is known is that everyone is straconvinti that he is the 'Chosen "(" The One "in English), but the reason for this belief is never explained! The only thing is that Thomas Figliodiandrea is that working in a cubicle by day and by night porn movies masquerading as Friend 90s at home still have a slow 56k connection. That's it! Unlike children in the house can see the Oracle, Neo does not bend spoons or flies cubes with the letters in the air - what sets it apart from ordinary people is that surf the Internet looking for the answer to the question "What is the Matrix." Wow. Very impressive. If Neo is able to use Google, you may also be able to dodge bullets and save mankind from slavery! Too bad that the sagacity of Neo stop there: both Neo asks what is the Matrix, so do not give a damn daughters going to reveal to friends and once the family has learned.
More cyberpunk and less crap!
A little game I like to do when I see films that I do not like or that I like in the middle is to imagine a remake where I keep some things the original and changed others to make a version of my own, enhanced the things that I miss and that I think would add depth to the story and depth to the characters. Had I done
Matrix, as I said, I would try to explore more the character of Neo. I would show why it is so special in the eyes of Morpheus, and what it says and makes a stir as Trinity. I showed her confusion once again in virtual reality: if such a thing were to happen to me, I think I would run by people who are important to me to make them sharers of truth, rather than sit and watch the waves dressed red (the time to do what it always is). I would also like to see taken to the parallelism with the myth of the cave: Neo and his companions do not think twice about embarking on their crusade against the Matrix, but those who can offer so much security that humans will be happy once released? Who makes you do wake up from their lives to deal with the virtual destruction of the real world? But the end is best, as always, doing things "American" and end all in cask between good and bad - and the Warner Bros. indictment avoids blatant plagiarism of our Rockets Amari.
----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
Pro
+ Interesting story from the premises
+ Beautiful +
action scenes spectacular Use bullet time
+ + very nice design
not bored, not even the millionth time that it regards
Against
- Neo is a cartoon character
- The lack of expression of Keanu Reeves does not improve the situation
- The history makes sense only to a certain point
- is concluded in the most American way possible
Judgement
+1
not rate very high, but is a positive vote.
If the plot had been kept more realistic and less space was given to the scazzottatte Dragon Ball , my vote would have been much higher, now that a The Matrix has made the history of cyberpunk and film d ' action.
's one of those movies that I like to do a remake that nobody else feels the slightest need.
Covering The Matrix through the eyes of now, however, was a different experience: it will be because they are more mature than me or because they are more mature and the time over the years, the sleights of Neo and his associates have become the subject of parody on a more or less daily, but after reviewing the film I could not help but fall in the tunnel of the 'what would have been better looking Ommioddio if they had been less superficial "in which I happen to end up more often.
But Neo, who the fuck is that?
The Matrix is \u200b\u200bone of those few films that have seen all that struck the imagination of everyone, even to those who have not liked. In 1999, almost everyone now had a cell phone and a computer, broadband began to spread and more people were able to understand concepts like "artificial intelligence" and "virtual reality". Matrix has surprised everyone with its spectacular action sequences, and intellettuaolidi that they could not admit that he liked the film to the trivial fistfights have decided to praise him for his modern reinterpretation of the myth of Plato's cave.
But besides some petty piece of philosophy, zen freeze-dried, circus acts and information for beginners there are the inevitable cardboard characters. Who is Thomas Anderson, aka Neo? Where you from? Who are his friends? What are your parents? What makes it so special to turn Trinity into a voyeur and to risk their lives to Morpheus? Bho! All that is known is that everyone is straconvinti that he is the 'Chosen "(" The One "in English), but the reason for this belief is never explained! The only thing is that Thomas Figliodiandrea is that working in a cubicle by day and by night porn movies masquerading as Friend 90s at home still have a slow 56k connection. That's it! Unlike children in the house can see the Oracle, Neo does not bend spoons or flies cubes with the letters in the air - what sets it apart from ordinary people is that surf the Internet looking for the answer to the question "What is the Matrix." Wow. Very impressive. If Neo is able to use Google, you may also be able to dodge bullets and save mankind from slavery! Too bad that the sagacity of Neo stop there: both Neo asks what is the Matrix, so do not give a damn daughters going to reveal to friends and once the family has learned.
More cyberpunk and less crap!
A little game I like to do when I see films that I do not like or that I like in the middle is to imagine a remake where I keep some things the original and changed others to make a version of my own, enhanced the things that I miss and that I think would add depth to the story and depth to the characters. Had I done
Matrix, as I said, I would try to explore more the character of Neo. I would show why it is so special in the eyes of Morpheus, and what it says and makes a stir as Trinity. I showed her confusion once again in virtual reality: if such a thing were to happen to me, I think I would run by people who are important to me to make them sharers of truth, rather than sit and watch the waves dressed red (the time to do what it always is). I would also like to see taken to the parallelism with the myth of the cave: Neo and his companions do not think twice about embarking on their crusade against the Matrix, but those who can offer so much security that humans will be happy once released? Who makes you do wake up from their lives to deal with the virtual destruction of the real world? But the end is best, as always, doing things "American" and end all in cask between good and bad - and the Warner Bros. indictment avoids blatant plagiarism of our Rockets Amari.
Pro
+ Interesting story from the premises
+ Beautiful +
action scenes spectacular Use bullet time
+ + very nice design
not bored, not even the millionth time that it regards
Against
- Neo is a cartoon character
- The lack of expression of Keanu Reeves does not improve the situation
- The history makes sense only to a certain point
- is concluded in the most American way possible
Judgement
+1
not rate very high, but is a positive vote.
If the plot had been kept more realistic and less space was given to the scazzottatte Dragon Ball , my vote would have been much higher, now that a The Matrix has made the history of cyberpunk and film d ' action.
's one of those movies that I like to do a remake that nobody else feels the slightest need.
Tuesday, April 6, 2010
Loan For Leasehold Business
rai
admit that since I started living abroad, I have become increasingly disinterested in the Italian political situation, which for me has become almost as important as the celeb gossip. By now everyone knows that Berlusconi is a mafioso and a pimp, that the League are the Italian version of the Ku Klux Klan and that the left is made by the ghosts of which even their most voters remember the name. Who wants to listen, knows these things already. Vannao gone on for years, and the antics of the new Nano or the new release of xenophobic Senatùr not interest me more now that my life was spent elsewhere.
When I get home, though, I can not help catch a summary of previous games because my relatives and friends speak very often about politics. And so I looked around on YouTube rai , and I learned that the PDL has risked Lazio because he had to hand over the lists at the last second you are out for a sandwich and Renzo Bossi, Umberto's son , after failing three times to maturity is now part of the people who administer the province of Brescia.
Beautiful stuff, Italians.
But now I know that there are years, and I know that things go well here - although when I hear talk of "good" and "evil" can not help but think that this country is increasingly Orwellian, and I can not suppress a shudder.
But one thing I do not understand: what the hell was he doing from Morgan Santoro?
When I get home, though, I can not help catch a summary of previous games because my relatives and friends speak very often about politics. And so I looked around on YouTube rai , and I learned that the PDL has risked Lazio because he had to hand over the lists at the last second you are out for a sandwich and Renzo Bossi, Umberto's son , after failing three times to maturity is now part of the people who administer the province of Brescia.
Beautiful stuff, Italians.
But now I know that there are years, and I know that things go well here - although when I hear talk of "good" and "evil" can not help but think that this country is increasingly Orwellian, and I can not suppress a shudder.
But one thing I do not understand: what the hell was he doing from Morgan Santoro?
Monday, April 5, 2010
Creative Usb Stereo Mix
Review: Avatar
We will send our message this ... E 'SPARTA!
Ah no, sorry, wrong movie.
Trailer in English
--------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Title: Avatar
Year: 2009
Country: USA
Genre: Sci-Fi
Length: 162 minutes
Director: James Cameron
Screenplay: James Cameron
Cast: Sam Worthington (Jake Sully), Zoe Saldana (Neytiri), Stephen Lang (Col. Quaritch), Michelle Rodriguez (Trudy), Sigourney Weaver (Mr. Grace), Giovanni Ribisi (Parker Selfridge)
Production: James Cameron, Jon Landau
Distribution: 20th Century Fox
- -------------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------
We will send our message this ... E 'SPARTA!
Ah no, sorry, wrong movie.
Trailer in English
--------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------
Year: 2009
Country: USA
Genre: Sci-Fi
Length: 162 minutes
Director: James Cameron
Screenplay: James Cameron
Cast: Sam Worthington (Jake Sully), Zoe Saldana (Neytiri), Stephen Lang (Col. Quaritch), Michelle Rodriguez (Trudy), Sigourney Weaver (Mr. Grace), Giovanni Ribisi (Parker Selfridge)
Production: James Cameron, Jon Landau
Distribution: 20th Century Fox
The gestation of this review has been long and painful.
Every time I watch a movie, in fact, explode from the desire to talk and share my views with someone. More often than not the only victim at hand is the irreducible Beppe, and as to my delusions of grandeur only one party is not enough I made up this blog in the vain hope of finding others in the immensity of the network. Unfortunately, the majority of the time I turn on the PC instead of putting them in writing is taken to be discouraged and let myself be distracted by a thousand other crap that the internet allows me to pursue. Here are my ideas so that the tyranny of the brain in a corner waiting for a propitious moment in which to express it properly - and so pass the days, weeks, the months and sometimes years (as has happened with many actions on True Heroes ).
Avatar has made me decide once and for all to become aware of this situation and change my goals so as not to kill Flat10 permanently. I realized, in fact, that if it takes me so long to write a review is because in theory I do not want to limit myself to just say if a movie is good or bad after a brief summary of the plot like so many others do, however. What I would like to do more analysis - but my love of detail would lead me to comment on the film almost scene by scene, what that requires a lot of time and effort to me that I write and to read the visitor.
now on so I'll be much, much more than I did with summary Inglourious Basterds and how I wanted to continue to do. I hope to be able to keep interesting, and if my readers will leave comments and questions to my work, I will be happy to respond. The blog exists primarily for that.
----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
Na'Vi , Tomcats puffosi with pigtails Jamaican hi-tech
$ 237 million well spent ... but maybe not
Avatar I did not like.
And not just because I could not believe the disproportionate success of the public who found worldwide, but also the praise of critics rated as Roger Ebert, I went to look twice. No way, my opinion has not changed.
I do not deny it is a superb piece of entertainment - but beyond the spectacular shots of beautiful pictures and you go a little further. The story would offer many ideas, but is also peppered with so many Americans to drop their arms. The villains are nasty and tontissimi. They spend billions to traverse the universe and to invest in research, but then the scientists do not care and kill a lot of biological miracles to dig a big hole. Not only that: even though they are armed to the teeth, they use their planes at low altitude to get by happily exterminate the flying lizards, instead of being a bit 'higher or directly to fire a rocket. Instead the good, of course, are very good. Especially Jake, who is the chosen one and learned to use his alien body in spite of all the others want to support us long training sessions to learn how to use it properly.
And after two hours and three quarters of the film, as well as some nice battle scene, I can not remember a dialogue that is worthy of note, a character that has struck me as new or realistic fiction or an idea that was nice as it should be explored. The question of the transmigration of his consciousness from one body to another, in fact, was immediately put on the background to make room for Pocahontas. Raising the barrel on the concepts that turned out to be a winning, since the 20th Century Fox with this film has earned about $ 3 billion (and gain some with the 'home video ). I am a bit 'sad but think that so much money went into special effects and easy emotions rather than on content with more pulp.
Sam Worthington gives us an intense intelligent expression, while facing away from the ELF should be observed in formaldehyde
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away ... but no.
James Cameron says Avatar is his Star Wars . I disagree. Star Wars had a spectacular design, and even if you were there too the revival of un'archetipo (the one the girl in danger), the characters were much more varied and interesting. The comparison between Darth Vader and then the Colonel Quaritch, or between the lightsabers and the avatars simply does not hold - nor the helicopters and the concept of 'I see you "against the Black Death and the Force.
Beyond the simple message pacifists and ecologists, from Avatar there is little to remember. Rather than Star Wars, I compare it to Avatar Tron . The 82 Disney revolutionized cinema in the way in which they exploit the computer graphics and became an object of worship for the way he treated the world of video games, but after a few years became a film known until a few nerd. And, frankly, well he was, given the history of cartoon idiot who proposes (but who also loved it at the Great Ebert ! 11).
----------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------
Pro
+ i +
Na'vi are pretty realistic idea of \u200b\u200bUSB embedded in the tail
+ beautiful scenes of battle not boring
+ + is colored, the bad guys lose and the good guys win the
+ developed technology to achieve Avatar is revolutionary
Against
- good design for a cartoon from Pixar, but not for a live action film
- Na'vi apart from, other animals have a graphic video game
- characters are not interesting
-
stupid dialogues - rather than make them do something, not Na'vi players simply hang around, to face the "world living "
- the ideas are explored and badly
- Pocahontas
space - good guys versus bad American accent simplification
- disproportionate budget for a film with very few commercial content
Judgement
- 3, and are was good to add the last "pro" which is actually an entirely independent of the final quality of the film itself.
Cameron's latest film is a pleasant entertainment and nothing more. I would stay surprised if, in thirty years , someone will quote again Avatar , play with dolls or video games the movies, or go to science fiction convention in disguise from wild blue. I predict however that 3D and SimulCam Cameron have come to stay.
Every time I watch a movie, in fact, explode from the desire to talk and share my views with someone. More often than not the only victim at hand is the irreducible Beppe, and as to my delusions of grandeur only one party is not enough I made up this blog in the vain hope of finding others in the immensity of the network. Unfortunately, the majority of the time I turn on the PC instead of putting them in writing is taken to be discouraged and let myself be distracted by a thousand other crap that the internet allows me to pursue. Here are my ideas so that the tyranny of the brain in a corner waiting for a propitious moment in which to express it properly - and so pass the days, weeks, the months and sometimes years (as has happened with many actions on True Heroes ).
Avatar has made me decide once and for all to become aware of this situation and change my goals so as not to kill Flat10 permanently. I realized, in fact, that if it takes me so long to write a review is because in theory I do not want to limit myself to just say if a movie is good or bad after a brief summary of the plot like so many others do, however. What I would like to do more analysis - but my love of detail would lead me to comment on the film almost scene by scene, what that requires a lot of time and effort to me that I write and to read the visitor.
now on so I'll be much, much more than I did with summary Inglourious Basterds and how I wanted to continue to do. I hope to be able to keep interesting, and if my readers will leave comments and questions to my work, I will be happy to respond. The blog exists primarily for that.
Na'Vi , Tomcats puffosi with pigtails Jamaican hi-tech
$ 237 million well spent ... but maybe not
Avatar I did not like.
And not just because I could not believe the disproportionate success of the public who found worldwide, but also the praise of critics rated as Roger Ebert, I went to look twice. No way, my opinion has not changed.
I do not deny it is a superb piece of entertainment - but beyond the spectacular shots of beautiful pictures and you go a little further. The story would offer many ideas, but is also peppered with so many Americans to drop their arms. The villains are nasty and tontissimi. They spend billions to traverse the universe and to invest in research, but then the scientists do not care and kill a lot of biological miracles to dig a big hole. Not only that: even though they are armed to the teeth, they use their planes at low altitude to get by happily exterminate the flying lizards, instead of being a bit 'higher or directly to fire a rocket. Instead the good, of course, are very good. Especially Jake, who is the chosen one and learned to use his alien body in spite of all the others want to support us long training sessions to learn how to use it properly.
And after two hours and three quarters of the film, as well as some nice battle scene, I can not remember a dialogue that is worthy of note, a character that has struck me as new or realistic fiction or an idea that was nice as it should be explored. The question of the transmigration of his consciousness from one body to another, in fact, was immediately put on the background to make room for Pocahontas. Raising the barrel on the concepts that turned out to be a winning, since the 20th Century Fox with this film has earned about $ 3 billion (and gain some with the 'home video ). I am a bit 'sad but think that so much money went into special effects and easy emotions rather than on content with more pulp.
Sam Worthington gives us an intense intelligent expression, while facing away from the ELF should be observed in formaldehyde
A long time ago in a galaxy far, far away ... but no.
James Cameron says Avatar is his Star Wars . I disagree. Star Wars had a spectacular design, and even if you were there too the revival of un'archetipo (the one the girl in danger), the characters were much more varied and interesting. The comparison between Darth Vader and then the Colonel Quaritch, or between the lightsabers and the avatars simply does not hold - nor the helicopters and the concept of 'I see you "against the Black Death and the Force.
Beyond the simple message pacifists and ecologists, from Avatar there is little to remember. Rather than Star Wars, I compare it to Avatar Tron . The 82 Disney revolutionized cinema in the way in which they exploit the computer graphics and became an object of worship for the way he treated the world of video games, but after a few years became a film known until a few nerd. And, frankly, well he was, given the history of cartoon idiot who proposes (but who also loved it at the Great Ebert ! 11).
Pro
+ i +
Na'vi are pretty realistic idea of \u200b\u200bUSB embedded in the tail
+ beautiful scenes of battle not boring
+ + is colored, the bad guys lose and the good guys win the
+ developed technology to achieve Avatar is revolutionary
Against
- good design for a cartoon from Pixar, but not for a live action film
- Na'vi apart from, other animals have a graphic video game
- characters are not interesting
-
stupid dialogues - rather than make them do something, not Na'vi players simply hang around, to face the "world living "
- the ideas are explored and badly
- Pocahontas
space - good guys versus bad American accent simplification
- disproportionate budget for a film with very few commercial content
Judgement
- 3, and are was good to add the last "pro" which is actually an entirely independent of the final quality of the film itself.
Cameron's latest film is a pleasant entertainment and nothing more. I would stay surprised if, in thirty years , someone will quote again Avatar , play with dolls or video games the movies, or go to science fiction convention in disguise from wild blue. I predict however that 3D and SimulCam Cameron have come to stay.
Friday, February 12, 2010
Black Rash In Hiv Victims
Production Management
In the back of the building in Jewry Street takes place on my fourth and final lesson of this semester Production Management. The aim of these lectures is to illustrate how it works and what does the figure of the producer in film and television teaching the basics of copyright and of all the bureaucracy behind the production and distribution.
The first lesson was only the introductory: The teacher has just read to illustrate our timetable and explain in brief leaders will take place as the semester. Despite the departure of quiet, threatens to be a very demanding teaching, because my final grade depends on a single, large coursework, while all others will always include at least two.
To close on the lesson, our teacher showed us the first ten minutes of Living in Oblivion, a little-known film with Steve Buscemi who talks about the misadventures of a crew committed to achieving a low film budget. The professor said that his intention was to make us think about what role a producer within a crew of this type (in the film producer is the blond girl who constantly screams into walkie talkie), but I think his real goal was to take us seriously if we are to continue working in this field.
Click here for the trailer Living in Oblivion.
In Italy came out with the title in Oblivion.
The first lesson was only the introductory: The teacher has just read to illustrate our timetable and explain in brief leaders will take place as the semester. Despite the departure of quiet, threatens to be a very demanding teaching, because my final grade depends on a single, large coursework, while all others will always include at least two.
To close on the lesson, our teacher showed us the first ten minutes of Living in Oblivion, a little-known film with Steve Buscemi who talks about the misadventures of a crew committed to achieving a low film budget. The professor said that his intention was to make us think about what role a producer within a crew of this type (in the film producer is the blond girl who constantly screams into walkie talkie), but I think his real goal was to take us seriously if we are to continue working in this field.
Click here for the trailer Living in Oblivion.
In Italy came out with the title in Oblivion.
Tuesday, February 9, 2010
Reviews Of Baby Lock Jewel Sewing Machines
scriptwriting
the teachings of the second half, this is definitely what I was expecting most of all. In Basic scriptwriting we will taught how to draft a screenplay for television and cinema, both as regards the technical aspect with regard to the content and style of narration. The teacher is the same Design for the Moving Image, and get it back in the chair is a pleasure for pleasure because his work exudes from every word. For this module I are required coursework two: one is the adaptation of The Swim Team, a tale of five pages of Miranda July, while the other is the creation of an original treatment, or to a detailed synopsis for a short period of fifteen minutes.
As Frank McCourt said in his Hey, Teacher! , when someone writes in America even the telephone directory is only a matter of time before someone else asks him when did he make a movie. The Swim Team has been adjusted just last year in a short film.
Today's lesson, as well as introduce the teaching itself, was focused on identifying the structure and the type of a story. As we all know already, a story follows well-defined structures:
- Expectation (Expected): characters and environments are introduced
- Development (D): the characters decide to do something
- Complications (Complication): an obstacle complicates the mission
- Climax: the characters face the obstacle at a key moment
- Resolution (Resolution): an order is established or re-established
What is less intuitive but is that when you write a good story should always take into account the presence of this structure to respect and use it. A viewer needs the characters to be introduced before they are put into action, but a narrator may also decide to advance action on presentations to make the story more exciting.
An example of a film that upsets the narrative structure is standard Pulp Fiction, where the beginning is the end. In fact, even in this circular structure characters are introduced to the audience before inserting them in the action itself, just that Tarantino decided to start from a point a little 'different. The same can be said for Memento by Christopher Nolan.
With regard to the types, the matter is very simple: there are only seven stories, the usual seven stories that are told all the time the dawn of time. To put it this way is a bit 'depressing, so let's say there are seven archetypes, like the seven musical notes, are only a limited number of starting points to build an infinite number of different stories.
- Achilles
The story revolves around an almost invincible hero, but has a fatal weakness. Characters that reflect this pattern are, for example, Dracula and Superman.
- Cinderella
The main character tries desperately to achieve his dream, most likely to improve its social and economic status. Examples of this archetype are The Pursuit of Happyness and every damn movie Rocky .
- The Chase
The main characters must complete a specific objective. It differs dall'archetipo Cinderella of the fact that the characters do not necessarily need to improve themselves or their status in order to achieve the goal. Obvious examples for this pattern are sacrosanct every fantasy film, do vobis.
- Faust
The main character makes a choice that led him to obtain immediate benefits, but serious problems in the long term. An example of this archetype is The Godfather.
- Orpheus
The main character has suffered a great loss, and seeks to bridge this gap is equivalent to looking for something or seeking revenge. An easy example is Kill Bill .
- Romeo and Juliet
The story revolves around the impossible love of the two main characters, although there is not necessarily a bitter end. An example of this archetype is Titanic, but also Brokeback Mountain .
- Tristan
The main character is attracted to two different people, but is forced to choose one. Two Italian examples for this pattern are The Last Kiss and Renato Zero . Even though my teacher is not entirely convinced, I like to think that under this type can be made to include also those stories where the protagonist is not so much attracted by two people, as two different ideals. I think such a Bertolucci's Novecento, where Jerard Depardieu plays a peasant Emiliano undecided whether to remain loyal to his friend or master adhere completely to the communist ideals.
These are the seven archetypes, others do not exist. Every story adheres to one of these types and reinvented, often in conjunction with: Star Wars example is a combination of "Cinderella" with "The Chase" and Scarface of "Cinderella" with the 'Achilles'. One of my classmate has found a film that includes all seven archetypes in Dragon Heart . Mine has occurred Lost .
As Frank McCourt said in his Hey, Teacher! , when someone writes in America even the telephone directory is only a matter of time before someone else asks him when did he make a movie. The Swim Team has been adjusted just last year in a short film.
Today's lesson, as well as introduce the teaching itself, was focused on identifying the structure and the type of a story. As we all know already, a story follows well-defined structures:
- Expectation (Expected): characters and environments are introduced
- Development (D): the characters decide to do something
- Complications (Complication): an obstacle complicates the mission
- Climax: the characters face the obstacle at a key moment
- Resolution (Resolution): an order is established or re-established
What is less intuitive but is that when you write a good story should always take into account the presence of this structure to respect and use it. A viewer needs the characters to be introduced before they are put into action, but a narrator may also decide to advance action on presentations to make the story more exciting.
An example of a film that upsets the narrative structure is standard Pulp Fiction, where the beginning is the end. In fact, even in this circular structure characters are introduced to the audience before inserting them in the action itself, just that Tarantino decided to start from a point a little 'different. The same can be said for Memento by Christopher Nolan.
With regard to the types, the matter is very simple: there are only seven stories, the usual seven stories that are told all the time the dawn of time. To put it this way is a bit 'depressing, so let's say there are seven archetypes, like the seven musical notes, are only a limited number of starting points to build an infinite number of different stories.
- Achilles
The story revolves around an almost invincible hero, but has a fatal weakness. Characters that reflect this pattern are, for example, Dracula and Superman.
- Cinderella
The main character tries desperately to achieve his dream, most likely to improve its social and economic status. Examples of this archetype are The Pursuit of Happyness and every damn movie Rocky .
- The Chase
The main characters must complete a specific objective. It differs dall'archetipo Cinderella of the fact that the characters do not necessarily need to improve themselves or their status in order to achieve the goal. Obvious examples for this pattern are sacrosanct every fantasy film, do vobis.
- Faust
The main character makes a choice that led him to obtain immediate benefits, but serious problems in the long term. An example of this archetype is The Godfather.
- Orpheus
The main character has suffered a great loss, and seeks to bridge this gap is equivalent to looking for something or seeking revenge. An easy example is Kill Bill .
- Romeo and Juliet
The story revolves around the impossible love of the two main characters, although there is not necessarily a bitter end. An example of this archetype is Titanic, but also Brokeback Mountain .
- Tristan
The main character is attracted to two different people, but is forced to choose one. Two Italian examples for this pattern are The Last Kiss and Renato Zero . Even though my teacher is not entirely convinced, I like to think that under this type can be made to include also those stories where the protagonist is not so much attracted by two people, as two different ideals. I think such a Bertolucci's Novecento, where Jerard Depardieu plays a peasant Emiliano undecided whether to remain loyal to his friend or master adhere completely to the communist ideals.
These are the seven archetypes, others do not exist. Every story adheres to one of these types and reinvented, often in conjunction with: Star Wars example is a combination of "Cinderella" with "The Chase" and Scarface of "Cinderella" with the 'Achilles'. One of my classmate has found a film that includes all seven archetypes in Dragon Heart . Mine has occurred Lost .
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)